Travers Johnson. Mrs. Jenkins. Both are players in this game, but in what way? My instinct tells me that Mr. Johnson is truthful when he speaks about a mysterious man paying him to spy on Mrs. Jenkins's house. If this hypothesis is true, then the man who paid the ex-cattle rancher is the true culprit. Next is the peculiar story of Mrs. Jenkins. Does this story fit into my working hypothesis? Assuming that it does, then the same person who excused the workmen is the same as the one who phoned Mr. Johnson. This hypothesis, if true, effectively eliminates both Travers Johnson and Mrs. Jenkins from the equation. Who else is involved that could be the true suspect? You can never escape your past. No matter how fast you run, how efficiently you hide, or how deep down you bury it you will have to confront it someday. In The Past Problem, the consulting Detective Smith comes to realize this. A single call to investigate the seemingly unimportant theft of an expensive purse knocks over the...

Под заказ:
	OZON.ru - 800 руб.	Перейти

Рейтинг книги: 4 из 5, 9 голос(-ов).